The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.
If citizens have no way to ensure that their state’s elections are conducted with sufficient transparency, fairness, and accountability to reflect the will of eligible voters, it is highly unlikely that the state maintains a republican form of government as guaranteed by Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution. A republican government fundamentally requires representative governance, where elected officials derive their authority from the consent of the governed through free and fair elections. Without any means to verify or trust the electoral process, this core principle is undermined.
Citizens, listen up! Our Constitution, in Article IV, Section 4, promises us a republican form of government, a system where we, the people, choose our leaders through free, fair, and transparent elections. That promise has been broken. Our elections are a black box: no audits, no observers, no way to check if only eligible votes are counted, and no effective paths to challenge irregularities. This isn’t just a glitch, it is a betrayal of our right to a government that represents us. When we can’t trust our elections, we’re not living in a republic; we’re under a system that could be hiding aristocracy or worse, one that ignores our voices and undermines our sovereignty.
This isn’t what our Founders envisioned. James Madison, in Federalist No. 43, warned against governments that subvert the people’s will, and the Constitution’s Guarantee Clause exists to protect us from that danger. A true republic requires elections we can verify, leaders we actually choose, and a government accountable to us. Right now, our election systems shuts us out, offering no transparency and no accountability. We are about to lose this Country and our Freedom. It’s time to educate ourselves, demand change, and stand together to ensure our elections reflect our will, because without that, our republic is merely a word, not a reality. We must fight for the government we’re owed, one that truly belongs to us and all our future generations.
The article above from Smartmatic, while ostensibly discussing the solution to disinformation through prebunking, subtly employs several psychological manipulation tactics aimed at controlling the narrative and conditioning public perception:
Establishing Authority and Credibility: By citing what some people think are esteemed organizations like the World Economic Forum and the Brennan Center for Justice, Smartmatic attempts to position itself as some kind of authority on election integrity. This tactic leverages the halo effect, where the positive attributes of these respected institutions are transferred to Smartmatic, enhancing its perceived trustworthiness without necessarily proving its own systems’ reliability.
Fear-Mongering: The article begins with a dire warning about the threat of disinformation to elections, invoking fear about the ‘deterioration of information ecosystems’. This emotional manipulation tactic is designed to make readers anxious about the integrity of elections, thereby making them more receptive to Smartmatic’s proposed solution, prebunking. Sadly, fear sells.
Repetitive Pattern Recognition: Smartmatic describes misinformation as having repetitive tactics, suggesting that they are well-versed in these patterns due to their research and partnerships with academic bodies like Cambridge and Google’s Jigsaw. This establishes a narrative where Smartmatic is the expert in identifying and countering disinformation, subtly implying that their proprietary systems are above scrutiny because they understand the threats better than anyone else.
Prebunking as Conditioning: The concept of “prebunking” itself can be seen as a conditioning tactic. By framing prebunking as a preventive measure against misinformation, Smartmatic is conditioning the public to accept their narrative before any counter-narrative can even be formed. This preemptive strategy is designed to inoculate the public against questioning Smartmatic’s systems or practices, by preemptively discrediting potential criticisms as disinformation.
Generalization Over Specificity: By focusing on the broad techniques of disinformation rather than addressing specific instances or criticisms of their own systems, Smartmatic avoids detailed scrutiny. This tactic diverts attention from any potential flaws in their technology by generalizing the problem, making it seem as if any critique is just another example of the disinformation they are combating.
Appeal to Public Trust: The article suggests that prebunking combats disinformation without appearing politicized, thus positioning Smartmatic as an impartial guardian of the electoral process. This can be seen as an attempt to manipulate public trust by presenting themselves as defenders of democracy rather than as the commercial entity with vested interests that they are.
Selective Research Presentation: Mentioning specific studies that support prebunking while not addressing the potential for misuse or the criticisms of such methods is yet another form of manipulation. It presents a one-sided view that conveniently favors Smartmatic’s narrative on election integrity.
Their intent here appears to be not to inform, but to preemptively shape public opinion in a way that discourages skepticism or new, potentially damaging, information about Smartmatic’s voting systems. This article can be seen as an effort to condition citizens to trust Smartmatic’s proprietary and opaque systems over public transparency and open scrutiny, which are fundamental to democratic accountability.
I encourage all citizens NOT to fall for these tactics, and instead to question the motives behind such information operations. The only way for the people to legitimately trust THEIR elections is if the PEOPLE are who once again run THEIR elections. Remember, EARNED trust is worlds better than MANDATED trust, especially by those who profit on our blind trust.
At the heart of democratic governance lies the voting system, a mechanism designed to reflect the collective will of the people. For this system to truly serve its purpose, it must be so simple and transparent that every citizen, regardless of their background, education, or technological literacy, can not only participate but also understand and verify every step of the process. This simplicity and transparency are not just about ease of use; they are fundamental to ensuring equal access to the electoral process. If the mechanics of voting are shrouded in complexity or lack transparency, trust in the electoral outcome diminishes, eroding the foundation of our republic. At its essence, voting involves eligible citizens marking their choices on paper, followed by a straightforward count of these marks. This process doesn’t necessitate elaborate or costly technology; instead, it demands clarity, accessibility, and the ability for public oversight. For American citizens to genuinely reclaim their electoral process, immediate and comprehensive reforms are imperative. Here’s what we must implement:
Voting early allows bad actors to do the following:
Measure voter turnout using mail ballot tracking, electronic poll books, and paper voter roll reporting.
Use this information cross-referenced with individual voter profiles to build an election results model
Use the model to determine how many votes short they are
Subtly inject extra ballots associating them with phantom records in voter rolls or low-propensity voters.
Swap out voted ballots with replacement ballots prior to tabulation
DO NOT VOTE EARLY
Go out and perform your own EXIT POLLING and record it! Be courteous! Get the videos to me and I’ll post them. These are IMPORTANT to gauge the accuracy of results.
Sign up to be an lead or agent of Operation Citizen Results Oversight (OCRO). You will monitor and RECORD election results to help provide the evidence needed to support the Patriot attorneys that will be working night and day to protect your vote!
Check your voter registration status. PRINT IT OUT and BRING IT WITH YOU in case you are told something different when you show up.
Get your sample ballot. Study it. Determine exactly how you are going to vote. Bring it with you when you vote.
If you cannot for some reason vote on Election Day, then vote AS CLOSE TO ELECTION DAY AS POSSIBLE to limit the advantage given to bad actors.
Go out and perform your own EXIT POLLING and record it! Be courteous! Get the videos to me and I’ll post them. These are IMPORTANT to gauge the accuracy of results.
Bring your proof of registration with you.
Bring your sample ballot with you to speed up your voting.
Vote IN HUGE NUMBERS. Carpool! Bring everyone you know. TOO BIG TO RIG only works if we show up overwhelmingly!
Bring chairs, drinks, snacks.
Vote in UNITY with your fellow Americans, in-person, Constitutionally.
If Patriots are willing to wait 12 hours to attend a Trump rally, are you really going to whine about a wait to CAST YOUR BALLOT in the safest way possible?
If you arrive to the polling center PRIOR to the close of polls, you are ENTITLED to CAST YOUR BALLOT no matter how long it takes. The polling center MUST remain open until every citizen in line in time casts their ballot.
Go out and perform your own EXIT POLLING and record it! Be courteous! Get the videos to me and I’ll post them. These are IMPORTANT to gauge the accuracy of results.
Could having real-time data about which voters have voted, when, and where, aid in this AI model?
Having real-time data about which voters have voted, including when and where, could significantly enhance the capabilities of an AI model designed to predict election outcomes for several reasons:
However, there are considerations and limitations:
In summary, while real-time voter data could indeed aid an AI model in predicting election outcomes more accurately, it would need to be implemented with careful consideration of privacy, accuracy, legality, and public trust.
Are there indications that AI may be being used in this capacity by anyone, including malicious actors that would not be concerned about any privacy or legal or ethical implications?
Based on information available up to October 20, 2024, there are indeed indications that AI could be used in ways that raise concerns regarding voter data privacy and potential misuse by various actors, including those who might ignore legal or ethical standards:
While direct evidence of malicious actors specifically using AI to misuse voter data in the 2024 context isn’t explicitly detailed in the provided snippets, the combination of AI’s capabilities in data processing, the noted security vulnerabilities in election infrastructure, and the general concerns voiced on platforms like X about election integrity suggest that such misuse is within the realm of possibility. This scenario underscores the importance of robust cybersecurity measures, ethical guidelines, and legal frameworks to safeguard electoral processes against AI-driven threats.
Would AI systems running on hardware and or software technology sourced from foreign nations, being used to manipulate parts of the 2024 election, be considered foreign involvement in our election?
Yes, AI systems running on hardware or software technology sourced from foreign nations, if used to manipulate parts of the 2024 election, would likely be considered a form of foreign involvement in the election. Here’s why:
However, proving that such involvement constitutes a deliberate act by a foreign government, rather than rogue elements or companies acting independently for profit or other motives, can be complex. The attribution of cyber actions, including AI-driven election manipulation, to specific foreign actors requires meticulous investigation to ascertain direct government involvement or direction.
In summary, AI systems on foreign hardware or software manipulating the 2024 election would indeed be considered a form of foreign involvement due to the origin of the technology, the intent behind its use, and the implications for national sovereignty and security. However, the degree to which this involvement is officially recognized or acted upon depends on diplomatic, legal, and intelligence considerations.
Would proving the act was deliberate in nature preclude the application of EO 13848?
Executive Order (EO) 13848, titled “Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election,” was signed by President Trump in September 2018. This EO is designed to respond to foreign interference in U.S. elections by imposing sanctions on foreign entities or persons determined to have engaged in such interference. Here’s how the deliberate nature of the act might relate to the application of EO 13848:
In summary, while proving the act was deliberate might reinforce the rationale for invoking EO 13848, the order’s application does not strictly depend on establishing deliberate intent. The focus is on whether there has been foreign interference, which can be determined by the act’s impact and the involvement of foreign entities, not solely by their intentions. Therefore, the existence of interference, rather than the definitive proof of deliberate action, would be the primary driver for the potential application of sanctions under this EO.
The claim from Jeff Boungiorno about there being a ‘massive breach’ Dominion’s server is NOT TRUE!!! I’m trying to reach him to let him know. If you know him or you are him, please contact me! This is the kind of thing that happens when someone thinks they know more than they do, and jumps to conclusions without having it reviewed by people that have more knowledge. I certainly am not a fan of Dominion, and am perfectly happy to shine a light on what they do that is wrong, but in this case, I must defend Dominion on this because this claim being made is UNTRUE. The claim is that this an indication of a virus:
Someone mistook uncompressed virus definitions in the pagefile as nefarious commands in the voting system. It is a FALSE POSITIVE and will serve only as a distraction and discredit vector for legitimate work and people. The part of the screen he shows is the part of the virus definitions for PowerShell/Timestomp.A and PowerShell/Timestomp/G viruses. Here are the Microsoft links on them:
Here is the reference to PowerShell/TimeStomp.G
Virus definitions are benign parts of a computer virus that the antivirus engine uses in order to detect the real virus. The names of the viruses are actually there in the screen shot, but someone that doesn’t have the proper knowledge/experience may not realize what they are looking at. I’m not saying he is lying to be malicious. I have no reason to believe it is anything other than an honest mistake at this time.
It is incredibly important that any claims are peer reviewed by people with the proper knowledge and experience to discern fact from fiction. We cannot afford the movement to secure our elections to be discredited, or anyone in our movement to be discredited.
Where did Jeff get this? Well, he got it from a previously-DEBUNKED ‘Mesa County EMS Server 2020 Election Investigation’ done by Josh Merritt. The report that Josh produced was full of assumptions and incorrect conclusions. That was communicated to Josh, but he refused to listen. I’m not sure why anyone with integrity would push something that is factually false and misleading unless they are attempting to discredit and distract people. I’m sorry to see that his work is still causing damage to people’s reputation.
Here is a screen shot from the video in the article, showing the same document that I already debunked in March 2023:
DO NOT SHARE THE LINK BELOW BECAUSE IT IS NOT TRUE. I am including it only for reference.
I have already let Miami Independent know this and suggested they take it down. They have put a notice on their page with a reference to this page.
Why? Why do trust them? Do you trust them because you are a programmer and have personally looked through the tens of thousands to millions of lines of code and examined exactly what it does, then compiled that to ensure that the resulting file hashes match those that are running on each of the voting machines you are using? Or do you just blindly trust them because someone you perceive as smarter and more qualified than you are told you to trust them? And that person that told you to trust them…are THEY a programmer that personally looked through the tens of thousands to millions of lines of code and examined exactly what it does, then compiled that to ensure that the resulting file hashes match those that are running on each of the voting machines you are using? Or are they just blindly trusting the person above them? And is the person above them just blindly trusting the certification lab that never looked at the source code? Did the certification lab just blindly trust the testing lab that didn’t even examine the logic of the source code, and has even missed blatant security requirements that the software has failed, yet they passed it in their testing despite that?
Or is your answer “I trust it because I tested it and it came out with the right answer!”? Do you realize that any programmer can program their software to detect it is being tested and behave perfectly in that instance, then do whatever they want it to do at any other time? No? Really? Did you hear about the Volkswagen Scandal in 2015?
What happened?
Volkswagen installed emissions software on more than a half-million diesel cars in the U.S.—and roughly 10.5 million more worldwide—that allows them to sense the unique parameters of an emissions drive cycle set by the Environmental Protection Agency. According to the EPA and the California Air Resources Board, which were tipped off by researchers in 2014, these so-called “defeat devices” detect steering, throttle, and other inputs used in the test to switch between two distinct operating modes.
In the test mode, the cars are fully compliant with all federal emissions levels. But when driving normally, the computer switches to a separate mode—significantly changing the fuel pressure, injection timing, exhaust-gas recirculation, and, in models with AdBlue, the amount of urea fluid sprayed into the exhaust. While this mode likely delivers higher mileage and power, it also permits heavier nitrogen-oxide emissions (NOx)—a smog-forming pollutant linked to lung cancer—up to 40 times higher than the federal limit. That doesn’t mean every TDI is pumping 40 times as much NOx as it should. Some cars may emit just a few times over the limit, depending on driving style and load.
Do you realize that if a car manufacturer can do it, a voting system manufacturer can also do the same thing? The car manufacturer benefited by selling millions of vehicles. A voting system manufacturer can benefit by controlling all the money and power in every country that uses their systems. Which do you think is a higher value target for bad actors? And that ‘voting system’ can just as easily be a ‘voter registration database’, an ‘electronic poll book’, and an ‘election night reporting tool’.
At some point, the citizens of America need to pull their heads out of their asses and realize that they will never have freedom again if they don’t IMMEDIATELY stop using computers for their voter registration lists, poll books, tabulation, totals aggregation, and election night reporting. If they realize this is the NATIONAL EMERGENCY that it IS, 2024 may very well be the end of the United States of America experiment.
If we do lose our beloved Country, I would certainly not want be any of those individuals that decided to keep their heads up their asses and take part in indirectly destroying this country that over 300M people call their home. I can’t imagine those 300M+ people are going to be too happy with them.
So the time to decide is right now. Will you keep your head up your ass? Or are you willing to pull it out and reconsider your actions? Do you want to be on the list of people that destroyed the United States of America, or do you want to be on the list that saved the United States of America? Tick, tock…
If you DO decide to make the sane decision, the next thing you need to read is https://handcountroadshow.org/the-early-voting-scam/
After that, watch my most recent presentation by clicking here. Don’t forget to click on the slides just below the recording so you have those to flip through too!